Mega Data Centres: Responsible Investment Begins with the Right Location

I support investment in technology and the infrastructure that helps Canadian businesses and institutions store and process data in Canada. That investment should be welcomed where its scale, infrastructure needs and surroundings make it appropriate. Location matters, particularly when a proposal involves a very large facility close to an established residential community.

My position is that mega data centres should be located in suitable non-residential areas, with a careful assessment of their relationship to nearby homes. I oppose the proposed location on Tenth Line West near Lisgar. The City identifies the application as 0 Tenth Line West, OZ 25-21 W9, for a two-storey data centre of approximately 220,000 square feet. The site is in Ward 9, but its proximity to Lisgar makes the discussion relevant to residents across ward boundaries. ^{[1] [2]}

Residents deserve an informed discussion about what a project of this scale would mean for their community. That includes independently reviewed information about continuous operating noise, cooling equipment, backup generators, electricity and water requirements, stormwater management and the impact on surrounding infrastructure. These should be assessed for the specific proposal rather than assumed from examples elsewhere.

The economic case also deserves scrutiny. We should understand the distinction between temporary construction employment and permanent jobs, what municipal revenues are realistically expected, what infrastructure upgrades would be required and who would pay for them. Public benefit should be demonstrated in a way residents can assess.

Consultation should take place early enough to influence decisions. Technical reports need to be accessible, important questions should receive clear responses, and any commitments relied upon in an approval should be enforceable within the appropriate authority. Residents should be able to understand how compliance would be monitored over time.

I respect the residents who have organized and raised concerns. I chose not to sign the circulated pledge because I could not endorse all of its language or the broader restrictions it sought concerning artificial intelligence. I prefer to state my position directly and assess each claim on its evidence.

My opposition to this location is clear. I also believe municipal government should remain focused on its responsibilities: appropriate land use, infrastructure capacity, neighbourhood compatibility and accountable decision-making. Broader questions about technology and personal freedoms deserve thoughtful consideration within the proper jurisdiction.

With suitable locations, credible technical assessment and clear accountability, Mississauga can support responsible investment while protecting the communities people call home.